Predicting decision-makers’ algorithm use

Decision makers typically integrate multiple pieces of information to make predictions and decisions. They also sometimes receive algorithmic advice, but often discount such advice. This usually results in less consistent accurate than consistently using the We hypothesized that individual differences on psychological traits as dutifulness (a facet conscientiousness), decision-making styles, predictor validity beliefs are related use judgment consistency, predictive validity. sampled participants with hiring experience (N = 308) who predicted performance job applicants based test scores interview ratings, they received The showed more dutiful used algorithm more, made predictions. did not find evidence an intuitive style was these outcomes. Exploratory analyses cognitive ability positively advice significantly Furthermore, other conscientiousness facets general factor were similarly outcome variables dutifulness. Organizations may want hire conscientious decision makers, beliefs. In addition, organizations could provide training validities.